This is the fourth part of The misunderstanding about islam. Hoping all this collection I received by my sempai can be Manfaat to all my friends out there. If you are not muslim, isokay to read because it is also consider as knowledge.... =)

Soalan & Salah Faham Terhadap Islam

6. Doa Tak Makbul

Penerangan Persoalan: Adalah mudah untuk kita menerangkan sebab musabab mengapa doa seseorang itu tidak dimakbulkan Tuhan jika orang yang bertanya itu adalah seorang Muslim yang tiada masalah akidah. Tetapi jika orang yang bertanya itu adalah seorang yang mempunyai masalah akidah, dan merancang untuk cuba berdoa kepada tuhan agama lain (berpotensi/ merancang untuk murtad), maka untuk menerangkan persoalan ini memerlukan sedikit point tambahan.

13:11 “Sesungguhnya Allah tidak mengubah apa yang ada pada sesuatu kaum sehingga mereka mengubah apa yang ada pada diri mereka sendiri”

Tidak ada satu agama pun yang penganutnya 100% kaya atau 100% miskin, 100% pandai atau 100% bodoh. Atau dengan kata lain, tiada satu agama pun yang penganutnya dapat 100% atau tak dapat 100% perkara yang dikehendaki. Maka, apabila doa dimakbulkan atau tidak dimakbulkan bukanlah jadi pengukur kepada kebenaran satu-satu agama. Malah Allah membantu semua manusia tanpa mengira kaum dan agama.

2:216 “…boleh jadi kamu benci kepada sesuatu padahal ia baik bagi kamu, dan boleh jadi kamu suka kepada sesuatu padahal ia buruk bagi kamu”

Cara-cara doa dimakbulkan: -

- Serta merta atau ditangguhkan

- Digantikan dengan yang lebih baik

- Dibalas di akhirat

7. Ah Chong Baik vs Ali Jahat.

Persoalan detail: Ah Chong adalah seorang non Muslim yang amat baik dan cantik akhlaknya. Manakala Ali pula adalah seorang Muslim yang amat jahat dan buruk akhlaknya. Tetapi apabila kedua-duanya mati, Ah Chong akan dimasukkan ke dalam neraka SELAMA-LAMANYA, sedangkan Ali akan masuk syurga setelah hukuman dikenakan ke atasnya. Ini TIDAK ADIL!

Situasi kes – Ah Chong telah diterangkan tentang Islam dengan jelas, tetapi beliau menolaknya, manakala Ali pula yakin dengan Islam tetapi banyak melakukan kejahatan dan hanya sedikit kebaikan.

51:56 Tujuan penciptaan jin dan manusia adalah untuk worship Tuhan Pencipta makhluk-makhluk ini, i.e. Allah.

103:1-3 Iman adalah salah satu syarat supaya manusia tidak rugi dengan kata sebenar.

4:48,116 “Sesungguhnya Allah tidak akan mengampunkan dosa syirik mempersekutukanNya, dan akan mengampunkan dosa yang lain dari itu bagi sesiapa yang dikehendakiNya (menurut aturan SyariatNya)”

Dosa syirik adalah dosa terbesar. Manakala dosa-dosa selain syirik boleh diampunkan Allah biarpun orang yang berdosa itu tidak meminta ampun.

Analogi: Pekerja kedai

Ah Chong dan Ali ditemuduga untuk bekerja di sebuah kedai. Mereka diterangkan dengan jelas mengenai tugasan mereka. Di antaranya adalah perlu datang kerja pada pukul 9 pagi, balik pukul 6 petang, mop lantai kedai, layan customer dengan mesra dan yang paling penting ialah wajib memasukkan hasil jualan ke dalam akaun syarikat.

Setelah kedua-duanya mula bekerja, Ali tidak patuh kepada kebanyakan daripada arahan syarikat. Hari-hari beliau masuk kerja pukul 10 pagi, balik pukul 5 petang, tidak pernah mop lantai, melayan customer dengan amat kasar, di mana akibatnya hasil jualan yang diperolehinya amat sedikit. Tetapi biarpun sedikit perolehan, beliau tetap memasukkan duit itu ke dalam akaun syarikat.

Manakala Ah Chong pula berwatak sebaliknya. Beliau amat patuh dengan hampir semua arahan syarikat. Hari-hari beliau masuk kerja pukul 8 pagi, balik pukul 7 petang, setiap hari mop lantai sebanyak dua kali, melayan customer dengan amat mesra, di mana akhirnya hasil jualannya menjadi amat luarbiasa. Walaubagaimanapun, keuntungan yang begitu lumayan tidak dimasukkan ke dalam akaun syarikat. Sebaliknya beliau memasukkan ke dalam akaun lain.

Maka siapakah yang akan dilaporkan kepada pihak polis dan seterusnya akan dikenakan hukuman berat?

I've received an email about this writing or should I say its an article? Well it doesn't really matter about it. Just to think together. ^^


Tawfik Hamid

A VERY VERY GOOD COMPARISON



Why a Jew can grow his beard in order to practice his faith
But when Muslim does the same, he is an extremist and terrorist!


Why a nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to God
But when Muslimah does the same she's oppressed

When a western women stays at home to look after her house and kids she is respected because of sacrificing herself

But when a Muslim woman does so by her will, they say, 'she needs to be liberated'!
Any girl can go to university wearing what she wills and have her rights and freedom?
But when Muslimah wears a Hijab they prevent her from entering her university!

When a child dedicates himself to a subject he has potential

But when he dedicates himself to Islam he is hopeless!

When a Christian or a Jew kills someone religion is not mentioned,
but when Muslim is charged with a crime, it is Islam that goes to trial!
When someone sacrfices himself to keep others alive, he is noble and all respect him.
But when a Palestinian does that to save his son from being killed, his brother's arm being broken, his mother being raped, his home being destroyed, and his mosque being violated -- He gets the title of a terrorist! Why? Because he is a Muslim!
When there is a trouble we accept any solution? If the solution lies in Islam, we refuse to take a look at it

When someone drives a perfect car in a bad way no one blames the car .

But when any Muslim makes a mistake or treats people in a bad manner - people say 'Islam is the reason'!
Without looking to the tradition of Islam, people believe what the newspapers say.

But question what the Quran says!

So just think about it follows friend. Just wanna share what I've been told. Nothing much. ^^

This is the part 03. It talks about " Why god create non-muslim if true islam is the right one "
I would be please if you leave some comment or anything. so we can share. Sharing is caring ^^

Soalan & Salah Faham Terhadap Islam

4. Kenapa Cipta Non Muslim?

Soalan detail: Jika Allah adil, kenapa tidak dicipta semua manusia sebagai Muslim?

Semua dilahirkan dalam keadaan fitrah, maka semua adalah Muslim ketika dilahirkan.

Yang penting ialah keadaan mati, bukan lahir.

2:6 “Sesungguhnya orang-orang kafir (yang tidak akan beriman), sama sahaja kepada mereka: sama ada engkau beri amaran kepadanya atau engkau tidak beri amaran, mereka tidak akan beriman”

17:15 Tanggungjawab diletak selepas seseorang telah melihat dan mendengar petunjuk

Bukan semua non Muslim adalah kafir – Perkataan kafir adalah datang daripada perkataan kafara, iaitu menolak kebenaran. Jika seseorang non Muslim itu tidak pernah mendengar mengenai kebenaran Islam atau tidak pernah diterangkan mengenai kebenaran Islam, maka tidak timbul persoalan bahawa dia telah menolak Islam. Penolakan terhadap Islam hanya berlaku jika dia telahpun mendengarnya, tetapi dia dengan sengaja menolaknya.

4:40 Allah tidak menganiaya walau seberat zarah.

Syahadah boleh terbatal – Sebagai Muslim, kita belum tentu akan kekal dalam Islam ketika kita mati nanti, kerana ada juga di kalangan Muslim yang dengan sengaja mensyirikkan Allah dengan apa saja cara. Maka orang yang dilahirkan dalam keluarga Muslim belum tentu akan kekal Islam.

*Sila fahami betul2 perbezaan maksud non-muslim dan kafir, baru anda akan faham analogi berikut.

Non-Muslim : sepanjang hidupnya tidak pernah langsung diterangkan atau mendengar tentang kebenaran Islam. Tidak timbul persoalan bahawa dia telah menolak Islam.

Kafir : mereka telah diterangkan dan pernah mendengar tentang kebenaran Islam, tetapi mereka menolaknya.

Analogi: Markah lulus peperiksaan bergantung kepada tahap ujian. Semakin sukar ujian, semakin rendah markah lulus. Sebaliknya, semakin mudah ujian, semakin tinggi markah lulusnya.

Soalan & contoh kes: Adebayor adalah seorang lelaki yang tinggal di kawasan hutan Afrika. Sejak kecil hingga ke tua dan seterusnya mati, dia langsung tidak pernah mendengar tentang agama Islam. Sepanjang hidupnya, beliau selalu berfikir tentang kewujudan Pencipta, tetapi beliau tidak tahu siapakah Pencipta itu. Beliau juga mempunyai akhlak yang baik. Walaubagaimanapun, beliau menyembah pokok dan alam kerana itulah yang diajar oleh nenek moyang, biarpun di hati kecilnya meragui amalan tersebut. Maka apakah kemungkinan nasib orang seperti ini berdasarkan 2:6, 17:15 dan 4:40? Allah sahaja yang tahu “markah lulus”nya. Wallahualam.

5. Makan binatang

Persoalan detail: Kenapakah orang Islam makan binatang? Bukankah ini perbuatan kejam? Bunuh haiwan tak bersalah.. kesian anak2 mereka ditinggalkan. . (selalunya ditanya oleh vegetarian).

Kerana Allah izinkan.

16:5 ”Dan binatang-binatang ternak itu, Ia juga menciptakannya untuk kamu; terdapat padanya benda-benda yang memanaskan tubuh dari sejuk dan beberapa faedah yang lain; dan daripadanya juga kamu makan”

Sistem gigi dan sistem penghadaman.

Haiwan herbivor dan karnivor dicipta dengan sistem gigi dan sistem penghadaman yang sesuai dengan pemakanan masing-masing. Begitu juga haiwan omnivor dan manusia yang dicipta dengan keadaan sistem gigi dan sistem penghadaman yang sesuai untuk memakan tumbuhan dan daging. Jika Tuhan melarang manusia daripada memakan haiwan, maka kenapakah Tuhan mencipta manusia dengan sistem gigi dan penghadaman yang sesuai untuk kedua-dua jenis makanan?

Tumbuhan juga bernyawa.

Kajian sains moden telahpun membuktikan bahawa tumbuh-tumbuhan juga mempunyai nyawa. Maka, seseorang vegetarian sepatutnya dianggap lebih kejam kerana banyak nyawa tumbuhan perlu dikorbankan untuk dimakan oleh hanya seorang vegetarian sahaja. Bayangkan berapa ratus nyawa perlu dikorbankan dengan hanya sekali memakan nasi?! Sedangkan satu nyawa lembu yang dikorbankan boleh dimakan oleh ramai orang! Maka siapa lebih kejam? Oleh itu, tidak timbul soal zalim kepada haiwan mahupun tumbuhan yang dimakan oleh manusia.

Islam agama universal.

Seandainya manusia hanya dibenarkan memakan tumbuhan, maka bagaimana pula dengan penduduk padang pasir dan eskimo hendak makan? Adakah penduduk di sana perlu memakan kaktus masak kari pada hari ini, kaktus masak lemak esok hari, kaktus masak kicap hari berikutnya, dan kaktus masak kurma pada hari seterusnya? Atau penduduk Eskimo perlu menyelam ke dalam air untuk mencari rumpai laut?

Walaubagaimanapun, bukanlah menjadi masalah dan kesalahan jika seseorang Muslim ingin menjadi Vegetarian.

This time is about grammer, writing system , bla..bla..bla2..hehe

Grammar

Every language has a basic word order for the words in a sentence. In English, the sentence Naomi uses a computer has the order subject (Naomi), verb (uses), and object (a computer).

In the corresponding Japanese sentence, the subject comes first, just as in English, but then the object appears, followed finally by the verb: Naomi-ga (Naomi) konpyuuta-o (computer) tukau (use).

The rule of thumb in Japanese is that in a sentence, the verb comes at the end. The two word orders, subject-verb-object for English and subject-object-verb for Japanese, are both common among the languages of the world. If we look again at the Japanese sentence, we see that the subject and the object are accompanied by particles, ga with the subject "Naomi" (Naomi-ga) and o with the object "computer" (konpyuuta-o).

These are called case markers, and a large number of the world's languages have them. We can see a remnant of a case-marking system even in English: the pronouns in English change shape depending on where it occurs, he/she/they in the subject position, but him/her/them in the object position (e.g., She saw him).

If we go back in history, the older English of five hundred to one thousand years ago had an extensive case-marking system similar to modern Japanese. These case markers make it possible for the words in Japanese to appear in different orders and retain the same meaning. In the sentence we have been looking at, it is possible to place the object where the subject normally occurs, and the subject in the normal object position, and not change the meaning: konpyuuta-o Naomi-ga tukau. If we do the same thing to English, the meaning of the sentence is radically altered (The computer uses Naomi).

If we have a more complex sentence, it is still possible to change the order of all the words as long as the verb remains at the end. The sentence "Naomi gave a computer to Taro" has the subject-indirect object-object- verb basic order, Naomi-ga (Naomi) Taro-ni (to Taro) konpyuuta-o (computer) ageta (gave). This sentence has the following word order possibilities, starting with the basic order we just observed.

Naomi-ga Taro-ni konpyuuta-o ageta  (subject-indirect object-object verb)
Naomi-ga konpyuuta-o Taro-ni ageta (subject-object-indirect object verb)
Taro-ni Naomi-ga konpyuuta-o ageta (indirect object-subject-object-verb)
konpyuuta-o Naomi-ga Taro-ni ageta (object-subject-indirect object verb)
Taro-ni konpyuuta-o Naomi-ga ageta (indirect object-object-subject verb)
konpyuuta-o Taro-ni Naomi-ga ageta (object-indirect object-subject-verb)

Although the Japanese language allows a multitude of word orders, the one inflexible order is the verb, in that it must appear at the end of the sentence. This is no accident. The core element in a sentence is the verb, because the verb expresses the action or the event involving the referents of the other words. Such a core is often referred to as the "head" of a sentence or a clause, and Japanese always places the head at the end of its clause. In a noun phrase, modifiers function to modify the head, as in expensive computer, where expensive modifies the head of the phrase, computer. In Japanese, the modifier always precedes the head, as expected (takai (expensive) konpyuuta (computer)). This is not only true of simple modifiers, but for modifiers that involve an entire sentence. Note that in the English sentence the computer [that Naomi uses], the bracketed portion modifies the head computer, and this modifier follows the head. In Japanese, the head-final order is invariably followed, so that this would be expressed with the modifier preceding the head: [Naomi-ga tukau (that Naomi uses)] konpyuuta. With few exceptions, the languages of the world either follow the head-final order, just as in Japanese, or the head-initial order (for example, Indonesian). Within the same language, we might see one or the otheroption for different types of clauses, as we saw for English simple modifiers (head-final) and sentence modifiers (head-initial). Japanese is consistently head-final for all types of clauses.

The Japanese verb does not indicate number or gender. The same form for the verb is used with singular and plural subjects, and no gender distinction is made. The verb inflects for tense, negation, aspect, and mood. Following are some inflections for the verb "to push," which has the root os-.

os-u (push) present/dictionary form
os-ita (pushed) past
os-anai (not push) negation
os-ite iru (is pushing) progressive
os-e (push) imperative
os-itara (if (you) push) conditional

These forms vary depending on whether the root of the verb ends in a consonant or a vowel. While the root of the verb "to push" above is consonant-final, a verb such as "to eat" has a vowel-final root (tabe-), and it takes a slightly different shape for each of the inflections: tabe- ru (present/dictionary form), tabe-ta (past), tabe-nakatta (negation), tabe-te iru (progressive), tabe-ro (imperative), tabe-tara (conditional). In languages such as Italian and Spanish, a rich verbal inflection that indicates both number and gender often allows the speaker not to express the subject if it is understood in the context, e.g., (Juan) vio ese film ((Juan) saw that film) in Spanish. In Japanese, despite the lack of number and gender inflection on the verb, it is possible not only to leave the subject out, but any other element in the sentence except the verb, so long as it is understood in the sentence. The Japanese counterpart of the sentence "Naomi uses the computer" may be expressed simply by saying the verb tukau (use), so long as it's clear to the hearer from context that the sentence refers to Naomi and to the computer.

In Japanese, ideas often expressed in other languages with separate clauses and sentences frequently take the shape of a word, albeit a complex one. This is the agglutinative nature of the language. For example, the expression in English, Naomi was made to go purchase a more expensive computer by Mary, contains separate verbs was made, go, and purchase. In the Japanese counterpart, these verbs together form one complex verb (Japanese uses "come" for the English "go" in this context) : katte-ko-sase-rare-ta (buy-come-made-was-past). Other languages that have an agglutinative verb system include Korean, Navaho, and Turkish.

Writing System

Japanese is traditionally written vertically, with the lines starting from the right side of the page. While this way of writing is still predominant, there is another way that is identical to English in starting from the top left hand side, with each line written horizontally.

Japanese is written using two systems of orthography, Chinese characters and syllabaries. Chinese characters, or kanji, were brought in from China starting about 1,500 years ago. Prior to their introduction, Japanese was strictly a spoken language. Chinese characters are by far the more difficult system because of the sheer number of characters and the complexity both in writing and reading each character. Each character is associated with a meaning; for example, the character $B9T(B has the basic meaning "to go." There are tens of thousands of characters attested, but in 1946, the Japanese government identified 1,850 characters for daily use. In 1981, the list was increased in number to 1,945 characters, and given the name Joyo Kanji List (Kanji for Daily Use). The characters in the Daily Use List must be learned in primary and secondary schools, and newspapers generally limit the use of characters to this list. Most characters are associated with at least two readings, the native Japanese reading, and the reading that simulates the original Chinese pronunciation of the same character. If the same character came into Japan at different periods or from different dialect regions of China, the character may be associated with a multitude of Chinese readings that represent different historical periods and dialectal differences. For example, the character , "to go," has four different readings, the Japanese reading and three distinct originally Chinese readings. The second system of wriiting are syllabaries, or kana, which were developed by the Japanese from certain Chinese characters about 1,000 years ago. Each syllabary represents a syllable in the language, and, unlike Chinese characters, it represents a sound but not meaning. There are two types of syllabaries, hiragana and katakana, each containing the same set of sounds. For example, the sound "ka" in Japanese may be represented by the hiragana or the katakana , both of which were developed from the Chinese character . Hiragana is often used in combination with a Chinese character, in such a way that, for example, the character represents roughly the root of a verb, and the inflection is written with hiragana. Katakana is used to write loan words from Western languages such as English, French, and German. It is not uncommon to find kanji, hiragana, and katakana used in the same sentence. Along with Chinese characters and syllabaries, Roman alphabets are sometimes employed for such things as names of organizations. For example, companies such as Honda, Toyota, and Sony often use Roman alphabets for their name in advertisements.